Clinical documents are read by hand
An analyst spends 15 to 30 minutes on an operative note to decide whether it supports what was billed. Two analysts reading the same note do not reliably reach the same determination.
Solutions / Utilization & Clinical Review
Utilization management carries some of the largest exposure in healthcare administration. CMS-0057-F now puts hard deadlines on prior authorization, and every denial has to hold up years later, long after whoever made it has moved on.
The problem
An analyst spends 15 to 30 minutes on an operative note to decide whether it supports what was billed. Two analysts reading the same note do not reliably reach the same determination.
CMS-0057-F sets decision deadlines with real consequences for missing them. Manual review capacity does not flex to meet a statutory clock.
A determination that cannot show the clinical evidence it relied on is one that gets overturned, often years later, at an administrative hearing.
How we solve it
Deterministic extraction pulls structure out of the document first. The clinical model reasons over that structure instead of the raw page.
SUPPORTED, NOT SUPPORTED or INSUFFICIENT, each one quoting the lines it relied on. An appeals reviewer can trace any conclusion back to the page it came from.
Medical-necessity denials route to human sign-off. That rule sits at the platform level, and no administrator setting turns it off.
What you get
The agents
Each one is trained, tested and audited on its own, built from the same skill library and governed the same way as everything else on the platform.
Who uses it
Next step
We run your historic records through the agents and show you what each one finds, with its evidence, before anything is switched on.